|
|
||||||||||||||
|
RUNNING TOTALS FOR THE ETTRICK FISH COUNTER, PHILIPHAUGH NET UPSTREAM FOR FISH OVER 40cms NOTE : These are unprocessed figures and will change slightly on complete analysis
(1) 1999 -The counter was out of operation for the second half of July and the first half of August but the water was then very low (2) The Spring of 2001 was cold and then very dry, so there were no spates in the first half of the year to bring the fish up (3) 2003 - An electrical storm on the 30th of May put the counter out of action. There was a substantial run of fish on the 31st which was uncounted. The monthly total for May is correct to the 6th, then is an estimate from then to the 29th when it was last manually read. The estimate given for May 2003 does not include any element for the 29th to the 31st of May . The counter was re-installed on the 4th July, so the July total is for only 27 days (4) Data from 2003 is not used to calculate the monthly averages for May, June and July or for the annual figures (5)(1) A log in the scanner in June 2004 could not be removed till after the spate that had brought it down had passed (6) The counter switched itself off on the 26th May 2005 and was not restarted till the 2nd June. (1) The counts for the five full days before the switch off were 20,12,21,7 &11 respectively (daily average = 14), and 3, 17, 20,11 & 23 (daily average 15). Taking the average for a missing day as 14 therefore, 84 fish have been added to the May total, and 28 to the June (=112 extra for the total to the end of June) Three video clips can be seen below, showing the passage of a small trout, a salmon during the night, and a slower than usual Salmon on which more detail can be seen. http://www.tweedfoundation.org.uk/downloads/nightsalmon.avi http://www.tweedfoundation.org.uk/downloads/browntrout.avi http://www.tweedfoundation.org.uk/downloads/slowersalmon.avi 2006 The counter was out of operation from April to the 16th May, and for 24hrs on the 3rd of July. A software problem became apparent in late September – although all fish were being “seen” by the computer, many were then rejected. The recorded total for September was 2501, revised total using data from visual counts for the days on which these were made was 2629. For other days in the month, no revision possible so the monthly total is very much a minimum – there were 2366 “rejects” recorded for this month. The October count is complete from the 10th onwards, when the software was adjusted so that video clips were kept for each rejected EFFICIENCIES : The counter is set count fish down to a minimum of 40cms in length. Some fish smaller than that do get counted, but with a low efficiency. The efficiency is checked by putting an underwater camera just upstream of the scanner so fish coming through can be seen and it can be noted whether they are registered by the counter or not. Prior to its repairs in May 2003, the counter was 100% efficient for fish going Upstream and 88% efficient for fish going Downstream. After repairs it is 97% efficient for Upstream and 97.3% for Downstream fish over 40cms.
NOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE TWEED FOUNDATION |
|
[Home] [About] [Management] [News] [Contact] [Site map] [Join] |